Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The #Womentoread hashtag on Twitter

In response to the Strange Horizons analysis of male/female review statistics (spoiler: books my men get more reviews than books by women) a number of folks on Twitter have been contributing to a #WomenToRead hashtag. It’s meant to be a way to get female authors’ names in front of readers who have a habit of only buying books written by dudes, but I’m not sure how effective it is.

Reading through, it seems more like an exercise in frustration than genuine recommendations. In the better tweets, someone will say, “If you like [male author x], try:” followed by a number of names, or else writers will be listed by genre.

Unfortunately, while it’s great to point out what sort of books these women have written, they don’t really tell readers why they would fall in love with any particular writer’s work. When I see a laundry list of authors’ names scroll past, my eyes glaze over very quickly, especially when so many of them are Twitter handles.

Still, I understand the frustration: I personally feel invisible within the genre; I continue to get very nice emails from people who love my books but only discovered them well after the series was cancelled. My sales were so shitty that I don’t deserve to call myself “midlist.” To most people, I’m barely a hanger-on.

And yet I still got reviews in a number of places, and nice critical attention, too. Imagine how it must feel to not even get that much. Imagine how it must feel to work like crazy on a book for a year knowing that no magazine anywhere is going to bother reading it, let alone devote column inches to it.

There’s also this (please imagine replacing the word “math” with “writing.”)

From this page: http://xkcd.com/385/

People (mostly guys) have this weird idea that fiction written by women are all one sort of thing, as if it can all be lumped in as one type. There’s also the idea that, if a subgenre has a lot of women writers and readers, it has a yellow “Caution” tape around it to warn guys away.

For instance, two years after it was posted I still get traffic from this Tor.com article: Urban Fantasy and the Elusive Male Protagonist (let us turn away from the issues around the blog post itself, which I tried to address in the comments) and the comment section can be instructive/cringe-inducing/hope-for-humanity-destroying. To quote (copy & paste, so sic):

its come to the point where i wont touch a book with a female on the cover unless its been recommended by some friends or an author i respect.

it seems as if its all about alpha werewolves and master vampires in a three way relationship with an independant ass kicking woman, the majority of it could also be classified as soft-core porn.

For a lot of people, men write books in a genre (or in a tradition) while women all write the same book over and over with a few proper nouns switched out. What’s more, That Same Book is usually considered Someone Else’s Thing.

Anyway, I’ve been pretty up-front in the past that I don’t think reviews have much of an effect on sales figures, but it’s not just sales we’re talking about here. We’re also talking about the critical conversation within the genre (such as it is): how it changes, what’s becoming old hat, what’s offensive or wrong-headed. When women are left out of that conversation, their contributions become ignored.

So, to wrap up I want to make two points: First, if you’re recommending female authors, a long list of names, even if you break them down to five or six in a genre, are just going to make people skim. Pick one or two, give a good reason why for each. Make a specific pitch. Yes, that means people you know will be left out, but this isn’t a one-time thing, right?

(To that end, I’ll recommend Sarah Monette’s The Bone Key. I bounced off Monette’s epic fantasy series, but this story collection blew my mind. Kyle Murchison Booth is nothing like Ray Lilly, but the setting and tone of these tales are a fantastic antidote to the tentacle monster stories that dominate so much of the dark fantasy genre. And this shows why I’m crap at giving recommendations, because I’m always reading years–or decades–behind, so I’m never up on the current stuff.)

Second, if you’re one of those readers who glances at their bookshelves, sees nothing but books by dudes, then shrugs it off, it’s time to break a bad habit. There’s a wide world of great books out there to be enjoyed and no reason to hide from it. If you like awards, start checking out books written by women that win or get nominated for them. If most of your reading is off the bestseller list, start trying some of the female writers there.

The truth is, your results will be mixed just as with anything. Some writers you’ll hate, some will be meh, some will be new gotta-read favorites. Of those books by “gotta-read” authors, some will also have “a female on the cover.” Take chances. Grab things from the library or try the sample chapters on your ereader. It may take a while before you start finding new favorites, but if you’re like me, the favorites you have now took a lifetime to collect. Don’t give up quickly. Keep stretching.

Added later: As pointed out on LJ by user martianmooncrab, RT has a review section for SF/F but their numbers are rarely included in these surveys.

Added later: The Revenge: The author who started the hashtag explains her reasons.

Mirrored from Twenty Palaces. You can comment here or there.


Apr. 24th, 2013 08:23 pm (UTC)
Looking at my shelves I think the mix leans slightly towards more women authors than men. But then I started early reading Andre Norton and others early. That taught me long long ago back in the 70's that women write fantastic stories that are worth reading.

I actually felt a bit sad when I saw someone ask recently for book recommendations and specified that they wanted the protagonist to be male only for the suggestion. He was looking for urban fantasy and I presume wanted to avoid the typical romance novels though even there he is missing a bet. Amusingly the Twenty Palaces novels was on the list of the kind of books he was looking for.

I know my response to him included plenty of series by women, though I felt bad about leaving off great series which if he had unbent a bit I think he could have enjoyed.

I mean the entire Rogue Angel series is just exactly that fun urban fantasy but with a female protagonist. OH well, And that leaves out the excellent martial arts series by Kylie Chan since again a strong female protaganist. ::sheesh::

There would be Jennifer Estep's Assassin series. Exactly what he wanted except the protagonist is .... you guessed it female. ::rolls eyes::

I could keep going on and not all series are written by women but I always find readers who deprive themselves of enjoyment because of weird biases like that sad.
Apr. 24th, 2013 09:19 pm (UTC)
I have my own weird biases. I admit to it. I have a longstanding rule that I will no longer read books about rock stars. If there's a rock musician in the lead, it might be the best book ever, but ugh, no more.

But that's pretty different from rejecting all women.
Apr. 25th, 2013 04:33 am (UTC)
Meanwhile, when I tried to sell an urban fantasy novel with a male protagonist, I was informed by editors that those didn't sell -- I needed a female lead. And preferably a female byline.

Which is probably why the guy looking for recommendations wasn't finding what he wanted.

I think this is weird, either way; I never cared that much about the gender of either the author or the protagonist. I was happy to read McCaffrey and Norton and Brackett when I was a kid, alongside Heinlein and Brunner and Bradbury. (Never cared for Le Guin -- leaving her off the list was deliberate.) I liked James Schmitz' Telzey Amberdon, and C.L. Moore's Northwest Smith -- authors writing about the opposite sex wasn't an issue. So I never really understood why other readers cared.

But given that they do, I totally understand why female authors are upset. It's stupid.
Apr. 25th, 2013 05:28 am (UTC)
Kevin Hearne's books sell, and so do a few other guys writing in the genre. So do Rob Thurman's for that matter. I hate that sort of common sense.

I'll admit that I was one of those readers who read mostly (but not completely) male writers. Like most people, I didn't even think about it; I just picked up the stuff I liked. (I am a Le Guin fan, though.) I would have loved Brackett as a kid, but I missed it.

It wasn't until I got online that I heard people talking about men not reading books by women, and how stupid that was, that I took stock and changed my habits. Good thing, too.